Wednesday, October 06, 2010

THIS IS OUT OF TODAY'S CALIFORNIAN

Home / News / Opinion / Columnists / Phil Strickland: Strictly Speaking


STRICKLAND: Thomasian outs the insiders

StoryDiscussionSTRICKLAND: Thomasian outs the insiders

By PHIL STRICKLAND North County Times - Californian
Posted: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 12:00 am
1 Comment
Print



Font Size:Default font sizeLarger font size.Murrieta City Councilman Gary Thomasian went and did it now.



In an interview with The Californian, Thomasian outed the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority and his own council for conspiring to ignore more than 100 property owners, known as Murrietans for Quality Life, rightfully upset by the abuse of their property rights by government.



He's a member of both bodies: an authority appointee (in fact, chairman this year) and the Murrieta City Council.



The way this violation of the people went down was, the council secretly voted unanimously not to meet with the residents, and then instructed the city manager to convey to the authority the city's desire for it to do likewise.



He did. It did.



Also on the sly.



The council justifies its cowardice, citing Calvary Chapel's pending suit that charges the two bodies with extortion. The church seeks $25 million recompense.



The church claims the council and the authority tried to hold it up for the majority of its 118 acres in return for permission to develop the remainder. The church had intended to create a 95-acre campus.



Regardless of the politics, the cliched larger problem is transparency and accountability.



It's worth noting that authority members are not elected, but according to the Joint Powers agreement, must be elected to a position on the body ---- like the LAFCOs and many of the other outfits that take away our say over our lives at our expense ---- that appoints them. All five supervisors sit on it.



Anyhow, Thomasian has done a rare thing in opening the inside game to scrutiny.



The ubiquitous "they" are cringing.



Upon Thomasian's spilling the beans, some of the "they" in this case, namely Randon Lane and Doug McAllister, the two incumbents not up for re-election, refused to endorse him and threw their weight to a challenger.



Lane reportedly because Thomasian outed them. McAllister felt "uncomfortable." Yeah, no kidding.



Certainly the council has ducked its constituents' darn good questions about this outrageous and costly (up to six figures for a landowner) scam by which their rights are usurped.



For whatever reason, Thomasian finally took exception to this seizure-by-fiat of the landed's rights and said "No."



Come to think of it, if those residents paid for a lawyer rather than fees ...



----



NOTING NOTES: When hundreds of anti-quarry protesters followed the music in the sweltering Temecula heat two Sundays ago to protest the proposed Liberty Quarry, included with the Great Oak High musicians were performers from Temecula Valley and Chaparral high schools, as well as professional musicians.



Thanks all.



Phil Strickland writes from Temecula. Contact him at philipestrickland@yahoo.com

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

City Council Member Lashes Out At Private Citizen

Bob Kowell knows he’s not the most popular person at Murrieta City Hall. His Murrieta Initiatives C, D, and E has drawn sharp criticism from the members of the city council.

Rick Gibbs is an entrenched city council member, and former mayor, of Murrieta. Mr. Gibbs was one of the eight candidates present at the Murrieta City Council Candidate’s Forum at The Colony at California Oaks on Tuesday night.

The audience was stunned when Rick launched into a personal attack against Bob Kowell during the forum, pointing Mr. Kowell out in the second row, proclaiming that Kowell’s initiatives were the result of jealousy over incomes, and anger that candidates of the past who supported Mr. Kowell’s initiatives did not win their elections.

As the drama unfolded, some people in the audience sat stunned, while others actually applauded Rick Gibbs’ unethical attack. Mr. Kowell simply sat there, refusing to take the bait, and allowed Mr. Gibbs to continue his personal attack against him without retaliating.

Rick Gibbs did not seem to realize what he had done wrong, and at the end of the forum brushed by Douglas V. Gibbs, a candidate that supports Kowell’s initiatives, without even a word, or a handshake, as Douglas extended his hand.

Outraged by Rick Gibbs’ behavior, Douglas V. Gibbs called Rick’s actions unethical, and uncalled for. “City Council members,” said Douglas, “are supposed to be serving the citizens of the city, not verbally attacking them. Frankly, I was surprised about what I witnessed. Rick Gibbs claims to be a stalwart member of the community, yet verbally attacked Mr. Kowell without provocation.”

When the forum ended, Rick Gibbs vanished quickly.

“If city council members are supposed to serve the people of the city,” Douglas Gibbs added later, “Rick Gibbs failed to serve as an example of service by attacking Bob Kowell. It is one thing to be against the initiatives, but it is another to personally attack someone verbally in front of all those people. Surely, the code of ethics he swore to uphold would not condone such actions.”

Douglas Gibbs also said he thinks Rick’s anger is rooted in not only his opposition to Murrieta Initiatives C, D, and E, but also in past disputes he has had with Mr. Kowell.

Bob Kowell indicated that he did not feel threatened by Rick Gibbs’ actions, but that Rick’s outburst was not consistent with the kind of behavior a city council member is supposed to portray.